How Judges Judge
A judge’s role is to make decisions. This book is about how judges undertake this task. It is about the forces on the judicial role and their consequences, supported by empirical research from a variety of academic disciplines that observe and verify how factors can affect how judges judge.
On the one hand, judges decide by interpreting and applying the law, but much more affects judicial decision-making: psychological effects, group dynamics, numerical reasoning, biases, court processes, influences from political and other institutions, and technological advancement. All can have a bearing on judicial outcomes. In How Judges Judge: Empirical Insights into Judicial Decision-Making, Brian M. Barry explores how these factors, beyond the law, affect judges in their role. Case examples, judicial rulings, judges’ own self-reflections on their role, and accounts from legal history complement this analysis to contextualise the research, making it more accessible and enriching the reader’s understanding and appreciation of judicial decision-making.
Offering research-based insights into how judges make the decisions that can impact daily life and societies around the globe, this book will be of interest to practising and training judges, litigation lawyers, and those studying law and related disciplines.
A judge’s role is to make decisions. This book is about how judges undertake this task. It is about the forces on the judicial role and their consequences, supported by empirical research from a variety of academic disciplines that observe and verify how factors can affect how judges judge.
On the one hand, judges decide by interpreting and applying the law, but much more affects judicial decision-making: psychological effects, group dynamics, numerical reasoning, biases, court processes, influences from political and other institutions, and technological advancement. All can have a bearing on judicial outcomes. In How Judges Judge: Empirical Insights into Judicial Decision-Making, Brian M. Barry explores how these factors, beyond the law, affect judges in their role. Case examples, judicial rulings, judges’ own self-reflections on their role, and accounts from legal history complement this analysis to contextualise the research, making it more accessible and enriching the reader’s understanding and appreciation of judicial decision-making.
Offering research-based insights into how judges make the decisions that can impact daily life and societies around the globe, this book will be of interest to practising and training judges, litigation lawyers, and those studying law and related disciplines.
Original: $243.83
-65%$243.83
$85.34Description
A judge’s role is to make decisions. This book is about how judges undertake this task. It is about the forces on the judicial role and their consequences, supported by empirical research from a variety of academic disciplines that observe and verify how factors can affect how judges judge.
On the one hand, judges decide by interpreting and applying the law, but much more affects judicial decision-making: psychological effects, group dynamics, numerical reasoning, biases, court processes, influences from political and other institutions, and technological advancement. All can have a bearing on judicial outcomes. In How Judges Judge: Empirical Insights into Judicial Decision-Making, Brian M. Barry explores how these factors, beyond the law, affect judges in their role. Case examples, judicial rulings, judges’ own self-reflections on their role, and accounts from legal history complement this analysis to contextualise the research, making it more accessible and enriching the reader’s understanding and appreciation of judicial decision-making.
Offering research-based insights into how judges make the decisions that can impact daily life and societies around the globe, this book will be of interest to practising and training judges, litigation lawyers, and those studying law and related disciplines.
